Forestry in Indian Country: Solving Federal Forestry’s Rubik’s Cube
This publication explores how tribal forestry supports forest health, wildfire resilience, cultural stewardship, and rural economies, while highlighting the findings of the IFMAT III assessment.

This is Jim Petersen’s 3rd of four 10-year Evergreen reports on forests and forestry in Indian Country.This publication argues that tribal forestry offers one of the strongest working models for sustainable forest management in the United States, combining cultural, ecological, spiritual, and economic values in ways that many federal land systems no longer do effectively. It centers on the 2013 IFMAT III assessment and presents tribal forestry as a practical response to worsening wildfire risk, forest decline, and policy gridlock on adjacent federal lands.
A major theme throughout the publication is that tribes are achieving strong forestry outcomes despite chronic underfunding, staffing shortages, and heavy regulatory burdens. The issue highlights how tribal forests are often healthier than neighboring federal forests, how traditional knowledge and prescribed fire remain central to long-term stewardship, and how concepts such as “Anchor Forests” could support collaborative management across tribal and federal boundaries while also protecting jobs, mills, and rural economies.
The publication also emphasizes that tribal forestry is not only about timber, but about sovereignty, cultural continuity, workforce development, and stewardship across generations. At the same time, it warns that without greater federal investment, more professional staffing, stronger education pathways, and better support for wood-processing infrastructure, tribes will remain constrained even as they are increasingly looked to as leaders in forest restoration, wildfire resilience, and multiple-use land management


